STI ALcons RASTI Articulation Loss of Consonants to Speech Transmission Index convert

calculator calculation calculations computation calculate calculation converter conversion factor ratio articulation loss of consonants in ALcons in percent % speech transmission index STI ALcons intelligibility correlation STI Articulation Loss of Consonants Rapid Speech Transmission Index Noise Acoustics Talking convert Speech Transmission Index RASTI intelligibility correlation room size reverberation time background noise level sengpielaudio Sengpiel Berlin

Deutsche Version

• Intelligibility Conversion •

%ALcons = Articulation Loss of Consonants in % ← → STI = Speech Transmission Index

The understanding of speech (intelligibility) is directly dependent of the background noise level, of the reverberation time and of the size of the room. For the rating of the understanding of speech, we have different methods, where STI and %ALcons are established.

Fill out the respective box and click the 'calculate' bar below.

The used browser does not support JavaScript.
You will see the program but the function will not work.

AlC - STI Formula

"Correlation between STI und %ALcons" see page 9:
http://www.acoustics.salford.ac.uk/student_area/bsc3/sound_reproduction/Intelligibility.pdf

"Correlation betweenSTI und %ALcons" see page 13:
http://www.boseprodata.com/docs/manuals/Modeler/Section_VI-Supplements.pdf

This conversion is to be regarded with some doubts, because they are different evaluations of measurements.

The Speech Transmission Index STI is a machine measure of intelligibility whose
value varies from 0 (Completely unintelligible) to 1 (perfect intelligibility).

STI-Scale - sengpielaudio

STI	0 - 0.3	0.3 - 0.45	0.45 - 0.6	0.60 - 0.75	0.75 - 1.0
	unexcceptable	poor	fair	good	excellent
ALcons	100 - 33%	33 - 15%	15 - 7%	7 - 3%	3 - 0%

Since %ALcons expresses loss of consonant definition, lower values are associated with greater intelligibility. Zero %ALcons indicates perfect clarity. It is generally assumed that the maximum allowable value for typical paging applications is 10 %, assuming that the environment is relatively free of masking noise. For learning environments and voice warning systems, the desired value is 5 % or less.
We know of the characteristic nonlinear decrease of intelligibility with distance from the sound source.

There is an empirical conversion formula after Farrel Becker:

Umrechnung: STI ALcons RASTI - sengpielaudio

For r < 3.5 × D_c at which direct/reverberation ratio D/R = -11 dB

where
D_c = critical distance
r = distance from the nearest loudspeaker
T₆₀ = RT (averaged over 1 and 2 kHz)
V = Volume of the room
Q = Directivity of the nearest source
M = Acoustic modifier for reverberant power = 1 is a conservative assumption
(1 + n) = total number of equal sources
K = listener factor ≈ 2 % for a good listener

For r > 3.5 × D_c (reverberant field, always worse than above)
%ALcons = 9 · T₆₀ + K
%ALcons < 10 % intelligibility is very good
%ALcons < 15% intelligibility is acceptable
%ALcons > 15% intelligibility will be a problem

back

next

home